Two years ago, independent songwriters and publishers agreed to a $43.5 million settlement with Spotify over unpaid mechanical licenses. Now, the payout process doesn’t seem to be happening.
Back in 2017, Digital Music News broke the story that Spotify had agreed to settle Ferrick, et al. v. Spotify USA Inc., a massive copyright infringement lawsuit with independent songwriters and publishers. The out–court settlement allowed Spotify to close its case, avoid any claim legal liability, and move on with its multi-billion-dollar public fering.
The settlement was ficially signed by a federal judge in 2018. Now that the money is due in 2019, however, nobody seems to be getting paid.
According to information shared this week with DMN, the class action payout process is now riddled with problems. Those include flat-out non-responses, major errors in matching ISRCs with actual recordings, and other logistical problems. Jeff Price, founder Audiam, part SOCAN, told us that initial requests to match data and make claims were not receiving responses. Even worse, the assigned claims administrator, a company named Epiq, seemed largely unaware that the claims process was underway.
Don’t blame Spotify, however. Once the matter was ficially resolved, Spotify deposited $43.5 million into an interest-bearing escrow account, then walked away. The rest was out their hands.
In who’s hands is the matter with now, exactly?
Interestingly, the plaintiff’s lawyers in Ferrick v. Spotify received more than $13 million in fees after the settlement. Subsequently, the court appointed Gradstein & Marzano, P.C. and Susman Godfrey L.L.P. as ‘Class Counsel’ to oversee the distribution process. Those same attorneys don’t seem to be coordinating any the details, however.
Price told us neither were responding to inquiries or taking any noticeable interest in the distribution process. The claims seemed to going into a black hole.
The non-responses and frustrations forced Jeff Price to directly email presiding judge Alison Nathan on October 18th.
“We are having problems with the administrator hindering our ability to complete our submission as a member the class and were hoping you could help,” Price wrote.
“It is ten days since submission and we still have received no verification that (1) our file was received, (2) that the file was valid (3) communication in regards to when to expect the return file back (i.e. if it takes more than 6 weeks we miss the Dec 11th, deadline).”
Price told us that the letter was mailed as a total last resort, after receiving zero response from any the attorneys involved in the case.
“Please note, I am contacting you as a last resort,” the letter to judge Nathan continued. “Prior to contacting you, I contacted all Plaintiff attorneys and all Defense attorneys about these issues email. I also emailed the provided email listed on the settlement website (no response), called the phone number listed on the settlement website (a voice-mail recording that did not deal address these issues), and contacted the Administrator (a company called Epiq) directly phone at three their different fice locations (they stated they did not know anything about the Spotify Track-IDs and had no one for me to speak with).”
Price told DMN that since firing f that letter, he’s been able to actually get responses. “The plaintiff’s attorney responded to what I wrote,” he said. But he’s only been able to match about 10% the ISRCs in question.
And so the s—t show continues.
For those trying to make a claim for mechanical royalties owed between December 28, 2012 and June 29, 2017, you have until December 11th to make a claim. The place to start is here — good luck, my friend.
(top photo: Chris Panas)