Coffee Company Slapped With a $2.eight Million Fine for Infringing Bob Marley Trademarks

Jammin Java should now pay Bob Marley’s household $2.eight million.

The Ninth Circuit Court Appeals has dominated towards a cfee firm combating a lawsuit introduced by two firms owned by the late Bob Marley’s household.

The panel upheld a earlier resolution by a federal decide.  U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson had dominated in May 2017 that Jammin Java Corp would pay $2.5 million in damages to Fifty-Six Hope Road Music and Hope Road Merchandising.  The cfee firm had orally modified and waived the royalty fee schedule to Bob Marley’s household.

Jammin Java had continued to make use of the late singer’s title and trademark to promote cfee.  This occurred even after its license to make use of them had expired.

Upholding Wilson’s ruling, the panel wrote,

Jammin Java had reportedly failed to offer quarterly and annual statements.  Fifty-Six Hope Road had despatched the cfee firm a written discover.  The panel discovered each firms had “happy the procedural requirement for termination beneath the settlement.”

Jammin Java’s claims waiver didn’t have an effect on this alleged ‘breach.’  The panel discovered Wilson had “correctly granted abstract judgment” to each Marley firms.  They had sued, accusing the cfee firm breach contract.

Jammin Java had fought again, claiming Wilson had made a mistake.

Under California legislation, a “disfavored forfeiture clause” exists.  Wilson clearly missed this clause.

The panel disagreed.

The cfee firm had additionally claimed Wilson’s authentic ruling constituted a “windfall.”  Both Fixty-Six Hope Road and Hope Road Merchandise had failed to offer proof willful trademark violations.

Dismissing Jammin Java’s arguments, the panel discovered this proof was pointless.  This doesn’t apply to circumstances the place “a plaintiff seeks the defendant’s prits as a measure its] personal damages].”

In his authentic ruling, Wilson had additionally awarded each Marley firms $371,000 in damages.

You can view the ruling under.


Featured picture by monosnaps (CC by